Tuesday, 20 June 2017

The Gulf: Lies, Damn Lies and Anglo Women

Unlovely Reality: Gemma Beale

Part of what makes Anglosphere women so disappointing is the vast gulf between the reality and the ideal. From their earliest years, Anglo-American males are bombarded with images of thin, witty princesses endowed with engaging personalities who want to have sex with everybody. Films, television shows and popular music all extol the delusion that men can be ‘saved’ by forming a relationship with one of these flawless, semi-divine creatures

The reality, of course, is a massive let down: for obesity, shallowness, personality disorders, hypergamy and frigidity are what truly define women in the Anglosphere. Once the dream is shattered and truth takes hold, the red-pilled man begins to wonder if there are any limits to their criminality, cruelty and perfidy.The following case of Gemma Beale illustrates this dichotomy perfectly:
LYING Jemma Beale, 25, made false rape and sex assault claims against 15 different men — and sent an innocent man to jail for seven years, a court was told. Beale made allegations over three years but they were “grotesque inventions”, jurors heard.

She claimed she was attacked at a pub and outside her home, and gang raped in the street.
Beale said she was raped by nine men and sexually assaulted by six. All but one were strangers. Beale’s first allegation was against Mahad Cassim, who had given her a lift home after a night out. He was charged with rape and jailed for seven years.

But prosecutor John Price QC said: “That was a wrongful conviction. Mahad Cassim was innocent. The person responsible for the grave injustice was the defendant, through her false allegation and perjured evidence. She maintains that falsity still.”

Mr Price said it was “inherently improbable” Beale was attacked so many times and so frequently. He added: “Each of her reports was entirely false.”

In July 2012 Beale claimed she was sexually assaulted by four men with a piece of barbed wire in an alley. But jurors were shown CCTV of her walking home alone that night. Her injuries were self-inflicted, the court was told. In September 2013 Beale reported a sex assault by two men outside her home. Neither was ever identified.

Two months later, she reported a gang rape by eight men. One of those she identified, Luke Williams, was held on bail for two years. Mr Williams yesterday told how Beale had invited him to have sex with her at a party while her girlfriend was downstairs. He said: “I felt uncomfortable. I didn’t want her to feel rejected but I really didn’t find her attractive.”

Beale, of Bedfont, West London, denies perjury and perverting justice. The trial at Southwark crown court continues - Source: The UK Sun

Bellied like a whale

Despite stories like these, the Anglo-feminist matrix still seeks to propagate the myth of feminine saintliness via films, television, popular music and the gynocentric gutter press. And so the gulf between reality and illusion yawns ever wider, with two principal results:
  1. Ever more males become red-pilled at ever young ages, since The Gulf is too vast for the Matrix and its minions to conceal. Male mantises lack language and the Internet to communicate their grievances; human males have both. 
  2. Anglo women act out in ever more misandrist and perverse ways. The embattled Matrix, having alienated males and thus being utterly dependant on female goodwill for its survival/expansion, simply has to accommodate them. Ultimately, women will be able to walk the streets shooting men with impunity. In turn, this situation will entrench male red-pilled alienation, forcing the matrix into more defensive misandry and spawning yet more male alienation. The ultimate result of this non-virtuous cycle is easy enough to guess.

Sunday, 4 June 2017

The Shadows of a Dream: The Rise and Rise of the Anglobitch Thesis

When I started this blog ten years ago, it was my intention to create waves and cast shadows across the Manosphere. I knew my key insight – that Anglo-American culture’s mistrust of sexual freedom had created an especially misandrist, belligerent form of feminism – was entirely correct, and needed disseminating. Far from being ‘revolutionary’, as tradcon MRAs believe, Anglo-American feminism springs right from the frigid heart of Anglo-American civilization. This explains the unstinting support feminism receives from the state in all Anglo-Saxon countries, and why all attempts to resist it have proved so utterly futile. There never was a ‘golden age’ of gender relations in the Anglosphere; the puritanical Anglo-Saxon cultural bloc has been pedestalizing women and vilifying men for centuries, and thinking men have resisted this tendency for just as long.

When I began this blog, it was always my hope that thinking men in the different Anglo-Saxon nations would interpret my core concepts in their own way, and that different writers would develop them in new and interesting directions. Now, this dream has come to pass. As seeds are scattered by the wind to birth new forests, new scholars and writers have begun to develop an online Anglobitch movement with an intellectual integrity of its own. 

Foremost among these is the New Modern Man, an American blogger who has thrown off the misandrist shackles of American society for a new life in the Caribbean. Since most of my readers are based in North America, the national specificity of the NMM’s articles will be close to their hearts. He moves beyond my own strictly theoretical approach, offering life-coaching for Anglo males who really want that new life of true sexual freedom abroad. Yes, we all know the Anglosphere sucks for men but what do we do about it?  Here are links to some of his best articles:

And here is an incredible article about Anglo women he wrote for the famous manosphere hub, Return of Kings:

Speaking of ROK, here are two more excellent articles by other ROK writers which are unambiguously influenced by the Anglobitch Thesis:

Indeed, this sweet assortment is just the tip of the iceberg, because ROK is literally bursting with Anglobitch-derived material.


Wednesday, 31 May 2017

No Osama Bin Laden: Was Salman Abedi really just Sexually Disenfranchised?

Salman Abedi: was the young bomber an Islamic Terrorist or Englightened Incel?

Now we know a little more about Salman Abedi, perpetrator of the Ariana Grande concert bombings in the UK, he looks ever less like an Islamic terrorist and ever more like an American school shooter with a grievance against women.

I suspected this the moment I learned his primary targets were the obnoxious 'backbone' of Anglo-American society: teenage girls. We also know he was sent home from school for punching a teenage girl in the face. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to work out Abedi was no fan of Anglo-American girls.

Of course, Islamist beliefs also inspired his murderous act. However, it could also be argued that his Muslim beliefs also primed him to challenge the female entitlement culture that rules the Anglosphere. After all, the concert he attacked was a gynocentric, homosocial festival of female ‘empowerment’.  Indeed, even the British media felt moved to comment that his intended victims – teen girls – seemed strangely ‘specific’ for an Islamist with a generic grievance against western society. The wave of public outrage that engulfed the Anglosphere in the wake of Abedi’s attack was driven partly by the nature of his targets; after all, teenaged white girls are an exalted demographic in Anglo-American culture. 

Ariana Grande: Had Abedi simply worked out 
that girls like this were unattainable to him?

We have already ascertained that Abedi, somewhat predictably, had no wife or girlfriend. Again, this sets him squarely among the ranks of college and school shooters, who are invariably marked by an inability to form relationships and long-term sexual disenfranchisement. It seems that he flirted with a party lifestyle before becoming a Jihadi, getting drunk and taking drugs but never managing to acquire a willing sexual partner. One suspects that female sexual indifference alienated him from this lifestyle, leading him to a basic (if fuzzy) grasp of the West’s endemic Sexual False Consciousness. In other words, his ‘conversion’ was as much a coping strategy for romantic failure as it was an expression of religious faith.

Predictably, the foregoing points will be completely ignored in ‘mainstream’ discussions of Abedi’s motivations. Admitting that male sexual disenfranchisement and alienation are major problems in the Anglosphere would create too many ‘waves’ in this culture, undermining its self-image as a haven of ‘liberation’ and ‘progress’. 

The Anglo Media predictably framed the bombing
in 'Women, Good, Men Bad' terms

Putting the case in the simplest terms, does anyone seriously believe Abedi would have attacked the Ariana Grande concert if he had been enjoying regular orgies with nubile teens?

Almost certainly not.

Abedi takes out his trash before the bombing: 
his life seemingly contained very few orgies.

Saturday, 18 February 2017

Under the Radar: Why Female Personality Disorders are so Prevalent in the Anglosphere

Psychologists acknowledge that certain personality disorders are more common in women than men. This is especially true of the Borderline Personality Disorder, whose broad diagnostic criteria are outlined below:

Excessive, unstable and poorly regulated emotional responses
Impulsive behaviors harmful to oneself or to others
An inaccurate view of oneself and others, and a high level of suspiciousness and other misperceptions
Tumultuous and very unstable relationships

The same is marginally true of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder, as defined below:

An exaggerated sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Believes she is "special" and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
Requires excessive admiration
Has a sense of entitlement
Selfishly takes advantage of others to achieve her own ends
Lacks empathy
Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of her
Shows arrogant, haughty, patronizing, or contemptuous behaviors or attitudes

Psychologists claim that around 2% of the female population suffers from each of these 'Cluster B' psychiatric disorders (the third is Histrionic Personality Disorder). However, I would argue that far more Anglo-American women exhibit characteristics of all three – in fact, most women under 35 are either Borderline, Narcissistic, or Histrionic. Indeed, many simultaneously exhibit all three disorders in the cluster. Moreover, Anglo-American culture acts as an incubator for these personality disorders, which is why they are far more prevalent in Anglo-American women than women raised outside the Anglosphere.

In brief, most young Anglo women have unregulated emotions, act impulsively, are totally self-deluded and spend their prime years in abusive relationships with thugs, psychopaths and criminals.  While they might not fit all the diagnostic criteria, it has to be conceded that many if not most young Anglo-American women show strong Borderline tendencies. And among lower class, uneducated young women such tendencies are so pronounced as to be normal.

Similarly, an obvious majority of Anglo-American girls display narcissistic tendencies. After all, hypergamous expectations of ideal relationships with wealthy celebrities, rampant entitlement issues, lack of empathy and general selfishness are quite normal among young Anglo females, especially those of the white middle class. Certainly, only a blind man raised in a bubble could think that these traits only characterize 2% of American women.

Again, the young Anglo female's romantic obsession with 'exciting' criminals and psychopaths, her endless need for 'drama' and social stimulation, her unending quest for dangerous and dysfunctional relationships - these are textbook traits of the Histrionic Personality Disorder, which is also massively underdiagnosed in Anglo-American women.Why, a brief glance over the women's magazines on any Anglosphere newsrack suggests HPD is almost synonymous with Anglo females.

What cultural factors specific to the Anglosphere have led to this state of affairs? In short, why do so many young Anglo-American females exhibit serious personality disorders? How has this appalling situation arisen and why is it not acknowledged and addressed? Here are my thoughts:

Princess  Syndrome / Pedestalization – the Anglosphere, because of its puritanical heritage and tendency to sexual repression, has created a situation where women are set on pedestals from their earliest years. They can do virtually anything with complete impunity; make false sexual allegations, kill their own offspring, dismiss anti-feminist arguments without rational counter-claims, murder their husbands, drink drive, sexually abuse minors and deny fathers access to their children. Little wonder that so many Anglo-women are so narcissistic: the culture that surrounds them actively promotes such tendencies. Think of young Anglo girls’ fixation on Disney Princesses and hypergamous fantasies of perfect relationships. If the Anglosphere were committed to genuine equality as opposed to promoting misandrist feminism, and women truly had responsibilities to go with their endless ‘rights’, one can be sure that the rampant narcissism and BPD that currently define Anglo-American women would immediately shrink to negligable levels.

Rampant Individualism – at a general level, the English speaking countries are defined by a potent individualism that, while it is the source of the Anglosphere’s entrepreneurial strength, has contributed much to its collective pathologies. One recent study found that as many as 25% of American students exhibit narcissistic tendencies: tens of millions of people. 

The Anglosphere Beauty Premium – because most Anglo women are obese and generally unattractive, any female higher than a 5 grows up knowing hyper-entitlement in every sphere of life. At an anecdotal level, it is obvious that attractive Anglo girls are those most riddled with narcissism and BPD. Basically, any remotely-attractive Anglo female can get away with literally anything until the Wall hits them at 35. In a repressive, sickly culture that vilifies male sexuality and exalts all women, beautiful women are essentially goddesses who can do or say whatever they like. Consequently, mild genetic tendencies to narcissism or Borderline are massively amplified by Anglo culture; which is why virtually all beautiful Anglo females are selfish, cruel and evil. That said, even plain or ugly Anglo women often exhibit the same dark constellation of female personality disorders. One assumes this relates to the generic entitlement enjoyed by all young women in the Anglosphere. The obvious observation that BPD traits decline as women age strongly validates the Beauty Premium thesis; for once their beauty has faded, they can no longer act like cunts with total impunity. It really is as simple as that… cue religion, feminism and wire-frame tampon sculptures.

Why Is It Under the Radar?

Why do psychologists in Anglo-American countries downplay the widespread incidence of personality disorders in Anglo women? In my personal experience, every young attractive Anglo-American female I have ever met showed unambiguous signs of both Borderline and narcissism: all were entitled, impulsive, empty, self-destructive, hypergamous, entitled, selfish and self-deluded. Similarly, virtually all young lower class Anglo women (women without college or hope of it) exhibit undiluted Borderline tendencies. After all, the whole western underclass subculture of unplanned kids, thuggish suitors, welfare dependence and unchecked impulses seems largely built on poor female life-choices. At the very least, BPD and narcissism define considerably more than 2% of Anglo women (I would hazard a real-world figure of 60%, at least – maybe higher).

Firstly, for psychologists to admit that huge numbers of Anglo women exhibit severe personality disorders would create a lot of ‘waves’ in society. In a puritanical culture that places women on pedestals, the idea that so many women are broken and dysfunctional is not admissible. After all, the aim of the Anglo-American authorities is to promote the delusion that the Anglosphere is incomparably superior to other cultural blocs, that life in the UK or the USA is some kind of Shangri La where everyone is happy and fulfilled. Admitting that Anglo culture incubates relatively high numbers of unstable, entitled women does not fit that agenda and is consequently suppressed. Yet if the mental health services were to actually acknowledge the problem, huge savings could be made on the pernicious welfare bills of all Anglo nations; after all, the underclass is largely the product of dysfunctional female mating choices and other Borderline traits.

Secondly, Anglo-American psychology has a long-standing tendency to deny social class differences, preferring to pretend that people are individuals completely isolated from their social context. Of course, this is partly to legitimize the staggering socio-economic inequality that defines most Anglo-Saxon countries. However, it also means that research is often skewed away from incorporating social-class variables, leading to distorted findings that downplay the incidence of psychological phenomena in particular social classes (particularly the lower class). For example, the long-standing tendency of psychologists to use socially unrepresentative college students as research subjects is now widely acknowledged as statistically problematic. In the case of female personality disorders, their effective detection has suffered from their relatively common incidence in the lower social strata, which Anglo-American psychologists rarely acknowledge as a valid research variable. Underclass sociopathy is similarly under diagnosed, for the same reason. Any rational person’s daily experience in any Anglo country will tell them that far more than 2% of young women possess serious personality disorders, however.

Thirdly, the tendency to 'pedestalize' women that characterizes the Anglo-Saxon nations means the cultural authorities are loathe to present women in any kind of negative light. Accepting that a huge proportion of young Anglo-American women (probably most) are afflicted with Cluster B personality disorders confounds the default Anglo-Saxon cultural narrative that all women are perfect, guiltless and so on. Consequently, serious research into these important areas is either quashed or distorted in order to present women in a positive light.

Anglo Culture: the Cluster B Incubator

What is to be Done?

Because men created civilization, men can destroy it. Every building in every street is there because men planned and built it. Not women, not their cats; men. Because of this, men hold all the cards; piss us off and civilization dies. It’s as simple as that.

For normal men, Anglo-Saxon culture is an inherently flawed creation. Everything about it from the ground up is designed to exalt women and denigrate men. There is nothing male-friendly in the existing Anglosphere; it has declared war on men politically, economically, conceptually and legally. There is nothing there of interest to men at all. The situation has deteriorated beyond tinkering with minutiae or putting the clock back – only complete rejection of pan-Anglosphere civilization and all its institutions, root and branch, can now serve the enlightened man effectively.

This wholesale defiance should also apply to women. The Manosphere warns young men not to ‘stick your dick in crazy’ or how to spot girls with Borderline - all well and good, as far as it goes. Such methods are hardly failsafe, though; relationship blogs are full of Anglo-American men taken to the cleaners by Borderline maniacs. However, a solvent single man can simply erase ‘crazy’ from his life for the price of plane ticket; he does not need to spot or avoid it. A safer, more rigorous solution is simply to write Anglo-Saxon females off for good and direct all one’s energies towards pursuing women outside the Anglosphere. Single, solvent men have money for travel and nothing to lose: so what are you waiting for?